Technical Competency
Responsible Use of Information
Anchoring the Competency into Recruitment Processes
Step 1: Integrating it into existing frameworks and procedures
For those with no existing Competency Framework, this is relatively simple and is does not require integration or finding an equivalent within your own system. For those with Competency Frameworks, such as the UN, European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) and other agencies and organisations, you can find a table below of associated values, behaviours or competencies within other frameworks to allow you to incorporate and test this competency within an equivalent in your existing system.
| Murad Code Technical Competency | UN System (Old Values and Competencies, New Values and Behaviours) | Other systems |
|---|---|---|
| Responsible Use of Information |
Old: Integrity, Professionalism, Accountability
New: Integrity, Humanity, Deliver Results with Positive Impact |
EPSO: Learning as a Skill
EPSO: Information Management, Self Management WHO: Setting An Example, Act Professionally and Ethically, Be Trustworthy Professionalism IOM: Integrity |
Step 2: Adding language into your vacancy announcement, job description and Terms of Reference
In order to anchor this technical competency within the recruitment process, and onwards into expectations in terms of job performance, it is important to include wording in your vacancy announcement, job description and terms of reference. Some model wording for this competency is included below.
In the job/position tasks and responsibilities section:
“Risk assessment of use and representation of SCRSV information to include accuracy, recognition of information bias, stigma, myths, stereotypes and misassumptions, as well as recognition of risks to privacy/confidentiality, consent, safety and other survivor rights.
“Using and representing SCRSV information only after careful vetting and compliance with informed consent records associated with survivor information.”
“Use language and portray sexual violence or its survivor accurately and without perpetuating stigma or misunderstandings.”
“Ensure accuracy, without bias, assumption or misrepresentation in information sharing or using.”
“Preparation and planning for responsible open-source investigation/research which respects and upholds survivor rights.”
In the qualifications/experience section - what we are looking for?
“Demonstrated track record of accurate portrayal of SCRSV and its survivors, including use of non-stigmatising language”
“Applied commitment to the responsible use of SCRSV information based on informed consent and survivor rights and dignity.”
“Proven experience undertaking responsible and ethical open-source investigation/research which respects survivors’ rights and dignity.”
Step 3: Designing written tests or interview questions which assess this competency
One of the most useful ways of understanding a candidate’s competencies is to set either case scenarios or hypothetical examples to understand what they would do and how they would do it. You can also test technical knowledge through written assessments. These can all be tailored to the relevant field of work or specific job. A few broad examples are provided below, both as written tests and for interview questions.
Sample written test examples
Hypothetical (can be based on relevant context and job requirements):
You are in the comms team at an INGO/international organisation, you have been tasked with reporting both to Head Quarters and donors about documentation work with SCRSV survivors in Myanmar. What are your primary considerations for reporting?
You are asked to lead a team undertaking open-source research about SCRSV and other gender based human rights violations in Afghanistan. How would you apply Murad Code Principle 8.3 into the planning and operationalise of the project?
Technical:
What strategies do you use to ensure accurate representation of survivor experiences without reinforcing stereotypes or exposing them to stigma?
As a downstream user of SCRSV information collected from survivors, what steps do you take to ensure survivor rights are respected in your use of that information?
Explain how you mitigate the risk of information bias in your work.
How important is accuracy in SCRSV work and why?
Sample interview questions
Can you give an example of when you demonstrated responsibility when using sensitive survivor-related information?
Tell us about a time when you were concerned about the accuracy of the representation of SCRSV in your team and what steps you took to address the issue?
Please share an example of when you had to consider the risks of using open-source or third-party information about survivors. What did you do to ensure it was used safely and ethically?